Search found 11 matches
- Tue Jan 28, 2025 2:03 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Thanks for letting me use your server for testing, but unfortunately it is not useful for NAT-T connection. Unfortunately the NAT-T connection speed problem is not easy to find and fix. At the moment I do not know how long it will take, so I will promote the beta version to production and then take...
- Thu Jan 23, 2025 1:12 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
- Tue Jan 21, 2025 9:12 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Thanks for your help. I have released the beta version 1.01.98 which should fix these issues. Can you please try it and give me feedback? First testing confirmed that UDP Acceleration works when connecting to a CG-NATed server via AzureRelay. 50mbit link, 2kkm away from server - https://prnt.sc/nbn...
- Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:18 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Unfortunately the server I'm using for testing doesn't seem to work like yours. Please, can you create a test account on your VPN server and send me a address, port, user and password privately so I can do some testing? For testing, it's enough that the VPN allows me to ping an IP address. Sent tes...
- Fri Jan 17, 2025 2:04 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
And this is when connecting from Softether Client
Client config https://prnt.sc/daoanq5YxCTz
Client status https://prnt.sc/UleFZAEc6z4J
Server 4.38
Client 4.43
Client config https://prnt.sc/daoanq5YxCTz
Client status https://prnt.sc/UleFZAEc6z4J
Server 4.38
Client 4.43
- Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:42 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Yeah, so on the Server side the Azure VPN relay is enabled and its hostname is used as Remote Server on the VPNClientPro side On the server side i see: Physical Underlay Protocol - TCP/IP via VPN Azure (IPv4) IPv4 VPNAzure UDPAccel_Ver=2 ChachaPoly_OpenSSL UDPAccel_MSS=1309 UDP Acceleration is Suppo...
- Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:23 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Thanks for the info. At the moment the app always uses the ip address sent by the server ("udp_acceleration_server_ip"), when the server is behind a NAT this address is a private ip and therefore cannot be used. The problems will be solved in the next release... Okay, looking very much fo...
- Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:26 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Fingers crossed on seeing UDP acceleration in changelog someday :D And that day is today :D Sorry for not answering earlier So first and foremost, can't thank you enough for continuously improving the APP. UDP Acceleration runs fine when connecting to a server via DirectIP: Server side: https://prn...
- Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:27 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Acknowledged.
Fingers crossed on seeing UDP acceleration in changelog someday
Fingers crossed on seeing UDP acceleration in changelog someday

- Mon Jul 22, 2024 6:30 pm
- Forum: VPN Client Pro Discussion
- Topic: Feature request for softether protocol
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40002