colucci-web.it

Thanks for your help.
I have released the beta version 1.01.98 which should fix these issues.
Can you please try it and give me feedback?

Fix (SoftEther): When the "Use UDP acceleration" option was selected the configuration of additional remote servers was not handled correctly Fix (SoftEther): Udp acceleration did not support connections behind a NAT Minor improvements/bug fixes To get the beta version you can follow thes...

Unfortunately the server I'm using for testing doesn't seem to work like yours.
Please, can you create a test account on your VPN server and send me a address, port, user and password privately so I can do some testing?
For testing, it's enough that the VPN allows me to ping an IP address.

I did some tests with the SoftEther client and it doesn't seem possible to use UDP acceleration when the connection goes through VPN Azure. The connection status shows: Physical Underlay Protocol = TCP/IP via VPN Azure (IPv4) Protocol Details = IPv4 VPN Azure UDP Acceleration is Supported = No UDP A...

Thanks for the info.
At the moment the app always uses the ip address sent by the server ("udp_acceleration_server_ip"), when the server is behind a NAT this address is a private ip and therefore cannot be used.
The problems will be solved in the next release...

Hello,

the only setting that might affect the speed and/or stability of the VPN is the MTU.
As a starting point you might try setting the MTU to 1420 on both the client and server...

Fix (OpenVPN): Crash with passwords longer than 127 characters Fix (OpenVPN): The "dns server" option pushed by the server without specifying port 53 was not handled correctly New SoftEther "Use UDP acceleration" option in "Remote servers" section New Portknoking butto...

Fix (OpenVPN): Crash with passwords longer than 127 characters Fix (OpenVPN): The "dns server" option pushed by the server without specifying port 53 was not handled correctly New SoftEther "Use UDP acceleration" option in "Remote servers" section New Portknoking butto...

Hello,
no sorry but it is not supported. Maybe in the future but for now it is not planned.

Nella versione beta 1.01.96 è stata aggiunta la possibilità di importare le chiavi da un qrcode.
Se possibile, sarebbe utile avere un feedback...