Dev, really appreciate your work on porting softether client for Android.
Would love to add more customisations to the softether VPN config just like the official windows softether client.
The primary thing I am looking for is the ability to make multiple simultaneous TCP connections which is limited to only 1 by default.
Please consider.
Feature request for softether protocol
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 11:04 am
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Thanks for your interest and suggestion.
This protocol implementation was written from scratch and currently only supports basic functionality. Basically the VPN uses only one TCP connection.
Maybe in the future I will also add some advanced options...
This protocol implementation was written from scratch and currently only supports basic functionality. Basically the VPN uses only one TCP connection.
Maybe in the future I will also add some advanced options...
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 11:04 am
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Thank you. Really appreciate your work man!
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Also will be good if you add for udp acceleration support. Because in some countries tcp connection unstable i
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Thank you for the suggestion
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Up)
Using 1.01.86. Whenever i connect to SE server, I always see "UDP acceleration is supported: NO" in the session info. Regardless of connection type - DirectIP:443, UDP NAT-T or via AzureVPN
Is UDP acceleration unsupported by design on the client?
Thanks
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Hello,
currently it's possible to connect with TCP, UDP over DNS and UDP NAT-T.
The UDP acceleration is currently not implemented.
currently it's possible to connect with TCP, UDP over DNS and UDP NAT-T.
The UDP acceleration is currently not implemented.
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Unfortunately I can't give you an answer at the moment. The problem is that there is no documentation, so I first have to understand how it works and how complex this part is by analyzing the source code, after which I could start thinking about whether and how to modify my implementation. To answer you I must first find the time to analyze the SoftEther source code...
Re: Feature request for softether protocol
Acknowledged.
Fingers crossed on seeing UDP acceleration in changelog someday
Fingers crossed on seeing UDP acceleration in changelog someday